« Terug naar overzicht

A systematic literature review of reviews on techniques for physical activity measurement in adults

a DEDIPAC study

 The aim of this “review of reviews” was to provide a comprehensive overview of the methodological effectiveness of currently employed measures of PA, to aid researchers in their selection of an appropriate tool. A total of 63 review articles were included in this review, and the original articles cited by these reviews were included in order to extract detailed information on methodological effectiveness.

Self-report measures of PA have been most frequently examined for methodological effectiveness, with highly variable findings identified across a broad range of behaviours. The evidence-base for the methodological effectiveness of objective monitors, particularly accelerometers/activity monitors, is increasing, with lower levels of variability observed for validity and reliability when compared to subjective measures. Unfortunately, responsiveness to change across all measures and behaviours remains under-researched, with limited information available.

Other criteria beyond methodological effectiveness often influence tool selection, including cost and feasibility. However, researchers must be aware of the methodological effectiveness of any measure selected for use when examining PA. Although no “perfect” tool for the examination of PA in adults exists, it is suggested that researchers aim to incorporate appropriate objective measures, specific to the behaviours of interests, when examining PA in free-living environments.

Uitgever(s):

Download(s)

A systematic literature review of reviews on techniques for physical activity measurement in adults

Download PDF

---

Auteur(s)

Klik op de auteur meer artikelen te zoeken van deze auteur.

Kieran Dowd
Robert Szeklicki
Marco Minetto

---

Tags van dit artikel

Klik op de tag meer artikelen te zoeken met deze tag.

evaluatie
lichaamsbeweging
meetinstrumenten
meetmethoden
reviews
volwassenen

---